

Only a person who holds a direct and concrete legal interestfrom revocation of the disposition in question may bring an actionbefore the court. If interest to be restored is indirect or abstract, then the action is not allowed.
In general, an action may be instituted without first resorting to a remedy arranged by an administrative entity. However, in regard to levy of taxes, suspension or revocation of driver's license, etc., exhaustion of administrative remedy is a prerequisite to filing an action with the court.
Legal relationships in administrative law need to be stabilized promptly since there are far-reaching consequences of these influences. In this regard, actions challenging legality of a disposition must be filed within the period prescribed by Administrative Litigation Act or other applicable laws.
In principle, administrative proceedings and civil proceedings have similarities in the way they are held. However, as administrative proceedings are more deeply related to the public interest, there is a greater need for the court to intervene ex officio in administrative proceedings rather than in civil proceedings. In administrative proceedings, the court may examine evidence ex officio and consider the facts not averred by the parties though the parties also bear the responsibility to make allegations and to produce evidence.
When disposition is deemed groundless, or, excessively harsh and severe with all circumstances taken into account, even if it has any ground, the court is to revoke disposition in favor of the plaintiff. However, even where a demand of the plaintiff is deemed reasonable, if revocation of disposition is deemed remarkably inappropriate to the public welfare, the court may reject the demand of the plaintiff.
The losing party, like in other proceedings, may appeal against the judgment rendered by the trial court to the High Court and then likewise to the Supreme Court.
As institution of an administrative action does not preclude the effect or execution of disposition, the judgment in favor of the plaintiff may turn out to be useless if it takes a long time to obtain such judgment.
In this regard, Administrative Litigation Act empowers the court to provisionally suspend, upon a request from the plaintiff or ex officio, the effect or execution of disposition under certain circumstances. However, suspension of execution is not permitted if it is feared to have a seriously negative effect on the public welfare.

Copyright 2008 Supreme Court of Korea. All rights reserved.
This site is optimized for Internet Explorer 6.x and Firefox 2.x browsers.