본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE 【Syllabus of Latest Opinion】Supreme Court Decision 2015Du36485 Decided May 30, 2019 【Claim for Revocation of Disposition Suspending Deferment of Payment of Treatment Fee】 [full Text]
Summary
In a case where Party A, a qualified and licensed medical practitioner, established health care institution pursuant to the Medical Service Act and provided health care benefit to the insured of national health insurance and their dependents, (a) the establishment and operation of the pertinent health care institution was practically done by a medical specialist who had already been the head of other medical institution; or (b) Party A established the pertinent medical institution under the name of other medical specialists, both of which were in violation of the Medical Service Act, whether the pertinent circumstance alone can serve as a sufficient ground for refusing the payment of health care benefit or redeeming the considerable amount of the health care benefit received (negative)
Prev 【Syllabus of Latest Opinion】Supreme Court Decision 2019Du33712 Decided June 13, 2019 【Revocation of Readjudication on Relief Request for Unfair Labor Practice】
Next Supreme Court Decision 2017Da254600 Decided May 30, 2019 【Unjust Enrichment】
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100