본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE 【Syllabus of Latest Opinion】Supreme Court Decision 2019Du33712 Decided June 13, 2019 【Revocation of Readjudication on Relief Request for Unfair Labor Practice】 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Standard and method of determining whether a person constitutes a worker under the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act
[2] In the case where Party A, the head of an automobile dealership, terminated a car sales service agreement with Party B and others who worked as car masters (salespersons) at his agency, the car masters including Party B and Trade Union C in which Party B and others were joined as members made an application to the Labor Relations Commission for remedies for unfair labor practices on grounds that Party A’s termination of contract and the act of persuading its car masters to withdraw from trade union membership constituted unfair labor practices, the case holding that the car masters including Party B, who are the members of Trade Union C, constituted a worker under the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act
Prev 【Syllabus of Latest Opinion】Supreme Court Decision 2019Do3341 Decided June 13, 2019 【Indecent Acts with Feeble-Minded Person】
Next 【Syllabus of Latest Opinion】Supreme Court Decision 2015Du36485 Decided May 30, 2019 【Claim for Revocation of Disposition Suspending Deferment of Payment of Treatment Fee】
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100