º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2017Da258237 Decided September 10, 2019¡¼Contractual Amount¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Significance of an exclusive management agreement and standard for determining its legal nature
[2] In a case where Party A, an entertainer, concluded an exclusive agreement with Party B in which she delegated management tasks relating to her entertainment career to Party B and thereafter rescinded the exclusive agreement on the ground of a breach of fiduciary relationship, the case holding that the legal nature of the foregoing exclusive agreement constitutes an innominate contract that is akin to mandate, and that Party A may rescind the exclusive agreement upon termination of the mutual fiduciary relationship between the contracting parties
[3] Exceptional circumstances where the court is obliged to resume argument upon filing of an application by the parties concerned
Prev Supreme Court Order 2019Ma5464 Dated September 10, 2019 ¡¼Violation of the Publishing Industry Promotion Act¡½
Next Supreme Court Decision 2019Da235528 Decided August 30, 2019¡¼Assigned Money¡½
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100