본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2014Do9607 Decided May 14, 2020 【Violation of Medical Services Act】 [full Text]
Summary
In Article 17(1) of the former Medical Services Act stating, “[n]o one shall prepare a prescription and shall issue or send such prescription to a patient unless he/she is a physician in medical services who has directly diagnosed the patient,” the meaning of “direct” and “diagnosis”
Whether a medical diagnosis is considered to have been made only when there is an act to the degree required to give a certain diagnosis or prescription based on a patient’s conditions that are sufficiently credible from the perspective of modern medicine, and in a case where such an act is performed solely through telephone interviews, whether the circumstance that a doctor has met a patient face-to-face and given a diagnosis to the patient before and is already familiar with the patient’s medical condition and status is a minimal prerequisite for such telemedicine services (affirmative)
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2020Hu10087 Decided May 14, 2020 【Invalidation of Registration (Patent)】
Next Supreme Court Decision 2016Da239024, 239031, 239048, 239055, 239062 decided May 14, 2020 【Confirmation of Employee Status, etc.; Confirmation of Employment Status, etc.; Confirmation of Employee Status, etc.; Confirmation of Employment Status, etc.; Confirmation of Employment Status, etc.】
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100