| On May 22, 2014, the Supreme Court delivered en banc decision (Presiding Justice: Chief Justice YANG Sung-tae, Justice in charge: Justice KIM Chang-suk) for case 2012Do7190 on the violation of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents that, “despite an association that seeks to proceed on a rearrangement project is given a disposition of authorization for establishment, in case the disposition of authorization for the association’s establishment is invalid and therefore the association is not deemed established pursuant to Article 13 of the old Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, the selected head, director or auditor of the unestablished association does not fall under the ‘executive of an association or ‘association’s executive’ which is the principal to the violation of the Artice 85 subparagraph 5 or to the violation of the Article 86 subparagraph 6 in the old Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents.” |
