TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2021Da265010 Decided January 27, 2022 ¡¼Damages (Medical)¡½ [full Text]
Summary
¡¼Main Issues and Holdings¡½ Whether the physician¡¯s duty to explain should be discharged with an appropriate interval of time prior to the performance of medical activities (affirmative), and in a case where the physician did not give sufficient time for the patient to make a decision and instead explained the medical procedures to take place and immediately proceeded to perform the procedures, whether the physician¡¯s duty to explain can be considered to have been discharged (negative) In such an instance, the standards for determining whether the physician discharged the duty to explain with an appropriate interval of time

Prev

Supreme Court Decision 2021Do11170 Decided January 27, 2022 ¡¼Violation of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act; Violation of the Subsidy Management Act; Occupational Embezzlement; Fraud; Uttering of Public Document Falsely Prepared; Violation of the Act on Real Name Financial Transactions and Confidentiality; Violation of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment; Interference with Business; Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties by Fraudule

Next

Supreme Court Decision 2018Da207847 Decided January 27, 2022 ¡¼Confirmation of Invalidation of Dismissal¡½