TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2022Do364 Decided June 16, 2022 ¡¼Extortion; Special Intimidation; Intimidation; Special Bodily Injury; Special Violence; Bodily Injury¡½ [full Text]
Summary
¡¼Main Issue and Holding¡½ Meaning of ¡°a video-recorded product¡± stipulated in Article 312(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as a means to prove the substantial authenticity of a protocol in which an investigative agency recorded a statement by any person other than the criminal defendant Legislative purport of Article 134-3 of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure Whether the substantial authenticity of a protocol in which a statement by any person other than the criminal defendant was recorded can be proved by a video-recorded product which violates the method and procedure prescribed in the Criminal Procedure Act and the Regulations on Criminal Procedure (negative in principle)

Prev	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2017Do3829 Decided June 23, 2022 ¡¼Embezzlement¡½
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2022Da203804 Decided June 16, 2022 ¡¼Claim for Restitution of Purchase Price¡½