Decisions

All

TITLE	[Damages] Supreme Court Decision 2007Da4899 Decided April 23, 2009 [full Text]
Summary
[1] The meaning of ""creating confusion with any other person's business facilities or activities"" under Article 2 subparagraph 1 (b) of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act and the criteria for such determination [2] Concern for confusion with the business facilities or activities of the Seoul Arts Center, a public corporation, do not exist, when a local self-governing entity performed and exhibited cultural arts works, using the business mark containing the phrase of "" 예술의전당 (translated ""Center for Arts"")""

TITLE

[Damages] Supreme Court Decision 2007Da4899 Decided April 23, 2009 [full Text]

Summary

[1] The meaning of ""creating confusion with any other person's business facilities or activities"" under Article 2 subparagraph 1 (b) of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act and the criteria for such determination [2] Concern for confusion with the business facilities or activities of the Seoul Arts Center, a public corporation, do not exist, when a local self-governing entity performed and exhibited cultural arts works, using the business mark containing the phrase of "" 예술의전당 (translated ""Center for Arts"")""

Prev	[Withdrawal of Merger, Revocation of the Resolution of General Meeting of Shareholders] Decided April 23, 2009 Supreme Court Decision 2005Da22701,22718
Next	[Violation of the Prevention of Marine Pollution Act, Destruction of Ship by Occupational Negligence,Violation of the Seafarers Act]Supreme Court Decision 2008Do11921 Decided April 23, 2009

list