TITLE	[Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties]Supreme Court Decision 2009Do3505 Decided June 25, 2009 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether in pronouncing the defendant guilty, an act of wholly omitting a detail which shall be clearly indicated in the judgment requires reversal (affirmative) [2] The relationship of a number of crimes in case of obstructing several public officials in execution of their same official duties (=crimes of conceptual concurrence) [3] In a case of assaulting two police officers who started to move together upon receiving a report of criminal injury while swearing at them, and obstructing their proper execution of official duties relating to handling of report and investigation duty, the above crimes of obstructing execution of official duties are crimes of conceptual concurrence as stipulated in Article 40 of the Criminal Act

Prev	[Reappeal against Order to Dismiss Claim for Changing an Order]Supreme Court Order 2009Mo471 Dated June 25, 2009
Next	[Violation of the Public Official Election Act]Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1322 Decided June 23, 2009