All
TITLE | [Damages]Supreme Court Decision 2005Da65494 Decided April 9, 2009 [full Text] |
---|---|
Summary | |
[1] Whether each of several newspaper articles which damaged reputation should be separately analyzed (affirmative in principle) [2] Whether expression of a critical opinion about others constitutes a tort separate from defamation [3] Whether some of the newspaper articles that a newspaper company published about a strike and the collective agreement of labor union of a conglomerate company constitute torts as to the labor union since they intentionally distorted facts and thereby infringed the personality right of the labor union or its members |