Decisions

All

TITLE	[violation of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, Occupational embezzlement]Supreme Court Decision 2008Do10826 Decided March 12, 2009 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether Article 85 Subparagraph 5 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents is applicable to the case where selection and dismissal of partnership officers are done formally through a resolution which has defect of absence or invalidity (affirmative) [2] In case where a representative of incorporated company paid legal expenses for the director against whom a decision of provisional disposition staying execution of his duties, whether it constitutes a crime of occupational embezzlement

TITLE

[violation of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, Occupational embezzlement]Supreme Court Decision 2008Do10826 Decided March 12, 2009 [full Text]

Summary

[1] Whether Article 85 Subparagraph 5 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents is applicable to the case where selection and dismissal of partnership officers are done formally through a resolution which has defect of absence or invalidity (affirmative) [2] In case where a representative of incorporated company paid legal expenses for the director against whom a decision of provisional disposition staying execution of his duties, whether it constitutes a crime of occupational embezzlement

Prev	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2008Da45828 Decided March 19, 2009【Return of Deposit Funds】
Next	[Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (Psychotropic Drugs)]Supreme Court Decision 2008Do11813 Decided February 26, 2009

list