본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE 【Syllabus of Latest Opinion】 Supreme Court en banc Decision 2018Da296229 Decided May 21, 2026 【Lawsuit Claiming Collective Bargaining】 [full Text]
Summary
【Main Issue and Holding】 In cases that are subject to Article 2 of the former Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act, whether the previous legal doctrine of the Supreme Court, which ruled to the effect that an “employer bearing the obligation to engage in collective bargaining” refers to a “party in a relationship of employment subordination, that is, a party who has entered into an explicit or implicit employment contract with a worker for the purpose of receiving labor from the worker while directing and supervising him or her, and paying wages in return for that labor” should be maintained (affirmative)
Prev 【Syllabus of Latest Opinion】 Supreme Court Decision 2022Du34425 Decided May 29, 2026 【Revocation of Disposition Refusing to Make the Correction of Corporate Tax Assessment】
Next 【Syllabus of Latest Opinion】 Supreme Court en banc Decision 2022Do13370 Decided May 21, 2025 【Violation of the Medical Service Act】
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100