All
| TITLE | 【Syllabus of Latest Opinion】 Supreme Court en banc Decision 2018Da296229 Decided May 21, 2026 【Lawsuit Claiming Collective Bargaining】 [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| 【Main Issue and Holding】 In cases that are subject to Article 2 of the former Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act, whether the previous legal doctrine of the Supreme Court, which ruled to the effect that an “employer bearing the obligation to engage in collective bargaining” refers to a “party in a relationship of employment subordination, that is, a party who has entered into an explicit or implicit employment contract with a worker for the purpose of receiving labor from the worker while directing and supervising him or her, and paying wages in return for that labor” should be maintained (affirmative) | |


