본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2017Da258237 Decided September 10, 2019 【Agreed Money】 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Significance of an exclusive management agreement and standard for determining its legal nature

[2] In a case where Party A, an artist, concluded an exclusive agreement with Party B in which she delegated management tasks relating to her artistic career to Party B, and thereafter rescinded the exclusive agreement on the ground of a breach of fiduciary relationship, the case holding that the legal nature of the foregoing exclusive agreement constitutes an innominate contract that is akin to mandate, and that Party A may rescind the exclusive agreement upon termination of the mutual fiduciary relationship between the contracting parties

[3] Exceptional cases where the court is obliged to resume argument upon filing of an application by the parties concerned
Prev Supreme Court Order 2019Ma5464 Dated September 10, 2019 【Violation of the Publishing Industry Promotion Act】
Next Supreme Court Decision 2019Da235528 Decided August 30, 2019 【Assigned Money】
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100