º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE [Reappeal against Order to Dismiss Claim for Changing an Order]Supreme Court Order 2009Mo471 Dated June 25, 2009 [full Text]
Summary
[1] The meaning of and requirements for determining ""the defendant's property"" whose disposition can be prohibited through issuance of an asset-freeze order for collection as a forfeiture substitute against the defendant according to Article 42 of the Special Act on Forfeiture in the Crimes of Public Officers [2] Each real property is subject to an asset-freeze order for collection as a forfeiture substitute on the ground that there is a good cause believe that each real property actually belong to the defendant, in case where each real property obtained by the defendant through embezzlement of funds was registered in the name of his wife and younger brother
Prev [Rejection Decision]Patent Court Decision 2008Heo14230 Decided June 26, 2009
Next [Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties]Supreme Court Decision 2009Do3505 Decided June 25, 2009
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100